At its Dec. 15 meeting, the Custodial Civil Service Board (CCSB)
rejected a Portland Public Schools (PPS) proposal to give special
treatment to Portland Habilitation Center (PHC) janitors who are
applying for permanent positions with the school district.
PPS is returning to an in-house custodial staff because of an
Oregon Supreme Court ruling that the district’s 2002 decision
to contract out custodial work to PHC to was illegal under the Custodial
Civil Service Law.
That law requires that PPS hire from a pool of applicants created
by the CCSB, which is supposed to administer a competitive examination
open to all. PPS wanted to allow an ungraded cleaning class offered
by PHC management to substitute for the graded examination for applicants
from PHC. The PHC class was not open to the public at large, unlike
the exam, which tests basic math and English reading ability.
The district’s proposal was opposed by returning custodians,
who belong to Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local
503, and by others who took the test when it was last given. Several
hundred applicants took the test in August 2006, but the hiring
process stopped while the CCSB considered the district’s proposal
for several months.
PHC, and SEIU Local 49, the union that represents its employees,
argued that using only the test would discriminate against applicants
on the basis of national origin, since some PHC applicants have
limited ability to speak English, and the test was in English.
Others at the Custodial Civil Service Board meeting argued that
it was perfectly valid to test English ability, as English is needed
on the job. Wayne Curtin, a returned custodian, said he’d
seen how language difficulties with some PHC immigrant workers have
prevented them from understanding and carrying out instructions.
And one PHC employee told the Custodial Civil Service Board not
to let the class substitute for the test.
“I took the PHC training course, and I didn’t think
very highly of it,” said Robert Baker, a former Freightliner
machinist.
After several hours of testimony, the three-member Custodial Civil
Service Board unanimously rejected the PPS proposal because of the
11th-hour revelation that PHC offered the class only to its disabled
employees. PHC is a non-profit that gets preference for government
contracts under a law meant to employ individuals with disabilities
who need a sheltered work environment. Custodial Civil Service Board
members felt that since some of the limited-English janitors might
not have taken the class, the class wouldn’t remedy the concern
expressed by the district about discrimination.
Custodial Civil Service Board did however agree to another PPS
request — to reduce the weight of the exam in the hiring process.
The exam was to have counted for 60 percent and now will count for
20 percent. Work experience, employer reviews and answers to interview
questions will count for the other 80 percent.
“That’s not fair,” said applicant Bruce Komlofske,
who complained that the district reduced the weight of the exam
after he took it.
Oral interviews began in late December. The district hasn’t
said when it will complete the transition to in-house staff, except
that it plans to be finished by September 2007.