The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) will survey contractors
who test, balance and adjust HVAC (heating,ventilation and air conditioning)
control systems this spring to determine whether or not they should
have their own wage classification under state prevailing wage laws.
Testing and balancing of HVAC controls follows the installation
of the HVAC system. Installation is performed by Sheet Metal Workers.
Oregon’s prevailing wage law requires employees on state-funded
construction projects be paid wage rates comparable to wages paid
for similar work in the area where the project is located. Thirty-one
states have such laws, and of 16 states that BOLI contacted (including
Washington), all recognize testing, balancing and adjusting (TAB)
work as covered under the Sheet Metal classification.
Independent and nonunion TAB contractors in Oregon say that TAB
work is an industry unto itself and that it should either be exempt
from prevailing wage laws, or at least have its own wage rate classification
separate from the Sheet Metal rate.
Portland-based Sheet Metal Workers Local 16 disagrees.
“TAB is a big part of our industry,” said Willy Myers,
a business agent for Local 16. He said the union’s HVAC &
Metals Institute offers TAB certification classes to its apprentices
and journey-level workers and that all of its signatory HVAC contractors
perform TAB work.
The issue over TAB wages surfaced last summer when a nonunion crew
working for Beaverton-based Accurate Balancing Agency Inc. at the
Madras State Prison filed a wage claim with BOLI citing prevailing
wage law requirements. A BOLI investigator was sent to the worksite
in Central Oregon, where he determined that workers should be paid
at the prevailing wage rate for Sheet Metal Workers. BOLI said the
employees were owed back-wages and penalties totaling nearly $100,000.
Accurate Balancing Agency Inc. cried “foul,” claiming
that a BOLI determination in 2003 stated that TAB work was exempt
from prevailing wage laws. That, in turn, set off a firestorm among
open shop contractors, who threatened to sue the agency. Some of
those contractors called state and federal lawmakers to complain.
Labor Commissioner Dan Gardner told the NW Labor Press that wage
rates for TAB workers on public-works projects have never been challenged
before.
Gardner said work is not subject to prevailing wage laws if, “20
percent or less is physical in nature.” He said that when
Accurate Balancing sought a wage clarification in 2003, the owner
characterized the work as not physical.
“Based on the 2003 characterization of the work provided by
Accurate Balancing, our agency provided an appropriate response,
(that it was exempt)” Gardner said.
However, when the BOLI investigator was called in, he witnessed
work that was physical in nature more than 20 percent of the time.
Gardner said BOLI can make companies pay up to six years in back
wages if workers are improperly classified.
With a complaint on file, Gardner decided to appoint a subcommittee
of the Prevailing Wage Rate Advisory Committee to look at the matter.
The Advisory Committee is part of BOLI, established in 1995 by the
Oregon Legislature to assist the labor commissioner in administering
prevailing wage laws. The subcommittee consisted of an equal number
of union and open shop HVAC and TAB contractors, union and open
shop reps, and industry lobbyists.
Gardner said, the subcommittee agreed to compile a survey of the
TAB industry. A new committee is now meeting to craft the details
of what that survey will look like. Gardner doesn’t expect
the survey to be distributed for at least 90 days.
NOTE: The BOLI investigation at Madras prompted Sheet Metal
Workers Local 16 to file a similar complaint in Washington State
on behalf of employees working for Accurate Balancing Agency Inc.
It seems that some of the employees at Madras had also worked on
public works projects in Washington for basically the same wages
they were getting in Oregon.
An investigation by the Washington Department of Labor and
Industries’ Employment Standards Section found the company
paid workers between $10 and $20 an hour for work that was supposed
to be paid between $23.29 and $36.74 an hour. The company was ordered
to pay 11 workers $34,283 in back wages and benefits.