By DON McINTOSH, Associate Editor
Six years after letters containing anthrax killed two Washington,
D.C., postal workers, several complaints filed by union workers
in Portland suggest caution may be waning at the U.S. Postal Service
(USPS).
In December, to deal with a heightened volume of letters, Portland’s
central post office processed some letters without using machines
that were installed to detect anthrax.
That spurred members of Portland-based American Postal Workers Union
Local 128 to file a union contract grievance, a complaint with the
federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and
a report to the USPS postal inspectors.
The anthrax scare started a week after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks, when letters containing anthrax spores were sent to at
least five major news organizations; three weeks later, letters
containing a more refined version of anthrax were sent to two U.S.
senators. At least 22 people developed anthrax infections, and five
of those died, including two APWU members at the Brentwood postal
facility in Washington, D.C. Anthrax is a not-uncommon livestock
disease, but particular strains of the bacteria that cause it have
been developed for use as biological weapons.
In the wake of the attacks, Congress appropriated $1.4 billion to
protect the mail by buying and installing “biohazard detection
systems” in USPS facilities. By late last year, the systems,
manufactured and maintained by Northrop Grumman, had been installed
at all 283 major USPS processing facilities.
The systems are set up to catch anthrax in stamped letters collected
from postal boxes or home mailboxes — not commercial mass
mailings, which are the bulk of USPS workload. Anthrax-sniffing
machines are integrated into USPS’ high speed letter-cancelling
equipment. A vacuum takes an air sample from a batch of letters,
which is then tested by DNA analysis to look for anthrax. It takes
30 to 45 minutes to get the test result. If any of the machines
ever detect anthrax, an alarm is supposed to go off, and postal
workers have been trained to follow procedures to contain the batch
and evacuate the building.
That’s where mail processing clerk Roseanna Foster-Mikhail
comes in. Foster-Mikhail, a 22-year postal employee, is Local 128’s
safety and health representative, and the person responsible for
biohazard training for local postal employees. Her union’s
members maintain the machine, though another union, the Laborers-affiliated
National Postal Mail Handlers Union, represents workers who use
the machine.
The Portland post office has eight of the high-tech cancellation
machines, each capable of scanning and stamping the cancellation
mark on 30,000 pieces of mail per hour. But even that’s not
enough around holidays like Christmas, when letter volumes soar
— from 1.5 million pieces a night to as much as 3 million
pieces, according to L.C. Hansen, president of the National Association
of Letter Carriers Branch 82.
In an Oct. 4, 2007 letter, USPS’ national processing operations
manager David E. Williams authorized local managers, during peak
times, to cancel stamps using other machines that aren’t connected
to the biohazard detection equipment. APWU president William Burrus
protested the move in a Dec. 5 letter to the postmaster general.
“This change poses great dangers to employees and the American
public,” Burrus wrote. “It is not possible to predict
that future terrorist efforts will be coordinated to coincide with
the limitations of the policy.”
The next day, Williams wrote back to local managers seemingly reversing
the previous letter.
But the end-run happened anyway, in Portland at least, local USPS
employees say.
“This is a life and death issue,” says Local 128 Vice
President Brian Dunsmore.
Dunsmore estimates that somewhere between 300,0000 to a million
letters may have gone through the Portland facility in December
without being tested for anthrax.
The day after Christmas, Local 128 members filed an OSHA complaint
about it. OSHA doesn’t have any rules requiring workplace
precautions against anthrax, but the federal agency is investigating.
At the same time, Local 128 filed a grievance, charging that not
using the anthrax-detection machines violates a safety clause in
the union contract. The grievance is now at Step 2 of the process,
and it could take a year before it’s resolved by negotiation
or arbitration.
A late-December call to USPS postal inspectors brought a speedier
response. Inspectors visited the Portland facility Jan. 14 and wrote
a report. But so far USPS has refused to release it to the union.
“This is a priority for us,” said Dunsmore, the Local
128 vice president. “We’re pretty sure it’s a
problem throughout the nation.”
Adding to postal employees’ frustration, authorities have
yet to find out who is responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks.
And the FBI hasn’t updated members of Congress about the criminal
investigation since 2003, despite repeated requests.
There have been no anthrax attacks since 2001. But Foster-Mikhail
wants assurance that her members are as safe as possible. Will the
biohazard detection system work in the event of another anthrax
letter attack? It’s hard to know, since there’s no practical
or safe way to test the machines using letters that contain anthrax.
But Foster-Mikhail says the machines certainly won’t work
if they’re not used.
Last month at a Northwest Oregon Labor Council-sponsored breakfast
with Congressman David Wu, Foster-Mikhail asked for congressional
help.
“Washington, D.C. has this in operation all the time to protect
you,” she said. “But we don’t in this room.”
“I want them to commit to run it all the time,” Foster-Mikhail
said. “Does it really matter that your Christmas letter is
a day late?”