The Portland City Council on July 29 passed a resolution authorizing
staff to develop a legislative proposal for annexation of West Hayden
Island, to protect at least 500 acres as open space and to identify
no more than 300 acres for future deep water marine terminal development.
The council voted 4-0, with Commissioner Randy Leonard absent.
Union members turned out in droves in support of the resolution,
saying it was a jobs issue. Workers donning “Jobs” stickers
filled a good portion of the council chambers, plus half the balcony
seats. The Port of Portland estimated that some 1,200 family-wage
jobs would be created if a marine terminal were to be built.
“The kind of jobs that are associated with maritime development
are high wage blue collar jobs,” said port director Bill Wyatt.
The Port of Portland purchased the 814-acre island in 1994 with
the intention of building a large cargo facility. The island was
brought into the Metro urban growth boundary in 1983 specifically
for that purpose.
Jeff Smith, president of the International Longshore and Warehouse
Union Local 8, told delegates at a July 26 meeting of the Northwest
Oregon Labor Council that West Hayden Island is the only piece of
land within the urban growth boundary that provides access to two
railroad mainlines, interstate highway trucking corridors and a
deep-water port facility located on a newly deepened international
shipping channel.
“The channel deepening was a 10-year, nearly $200 million
federal, state and local investment in our maritime-trade future,”
he said.
A community work group formed by Mayor Sam Adams more than 18 months
ago was charged with advising the City Council on whether a mix
of uses was possible on the island. The group was not able to reach
a consensus. Eight members of the 15-member panel felt it was doable,
while six members said it was not possible. Eleven votes (75 percent)
were needed for the proposal to be forwarded to the City Council
as a recommendation.
Bruce Holte, a former president of ILWU Local 8 and a member of
the community work group, told City commissioners the committee
spent more than a year and a half reviewing various impact studies.
“It was clear from the discussions around the table, that
many of the members had strongly held views that were not going
to be influenced by the information,” said Holte, who also
serves as a commissioner on the Port of Portland. “This is
why it didn’t surprise me that we spent very little time discussing
how a mix use could be reconciled. I do believe that a mix of uses
on Hayden Island is possible.”
Tom Chamberlain, president of the Oregon AFL-CIO, agreed.
“Jobs and the environment can co-exist,” he testified.
“As much as we talk about green jobs in Oregon, we seem to
focus on the green part a whole lot more than we do the jobs part.”
Chamberlain pointed out that even though the proposal is about using
less than half of the available land for job creation, “this
isn’t recognized by our opponents as an economic sacrifice
or as a good-faith effort to balance those interests. Those of us
who want to keep this land in job production have already conceded
over 500 acres. Why is it so unreasonable to keep 300 acres for
jobs and trade?”
Opponents of marine development argued that mixed use on the island
is unattainable. They want all of West Hayden to remain wild. Environmental
activists successfully blocked annexation for industrial development
in 1999.
The City Council resolution calls for the annexation and development
guidelines to come back to council in December 2011.
“As amended, what we are agreeing to is a road map for the
second phase of analysis,” said Commissioner Nick Fish. “This
vote does not call the question on whether we go forward on annexation.
It does not call the question on whether we will develop any particular
way. But it does say that we believe there is a basis for going
forward into a second phase.”
Commissioner Dan Saltzman said the resolution, with the amendment
to limit marine development to no more than 300 acres, “does
strike a good balance and holds the Port’s feet to the fire
to make it work as efficiently as possible.”
Although she recognized Hayden Island as a valuable economic asset,
Commissioner Amanda Fritz said she was “not yet convinced
that the costs of developing this site as a marine terminal outweigh
its environmental, recreation, and open space values. Doing what’s
right is our city’s mantra for a sustainable development,
and it often costs us more than doing what is wrong. This council
has demonstrated over and over that we are willing to pay to do
the right thing for the Climate Action Plan and for other goals
our citizens value.”
Hayden Island is located in the lower Columbia River at its confluence
with the Willamette River. It is part of a regional network of natural
areas that provide habitat for migrating birds and many other species.
Hayden Island is bisected by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
line. Currently, the western portion of the island contains electrical
power lines, transmission towers, the Columbia Wastewater Treatment
Plant pump house and de-chlorination facility, and dredge spoils
and storage.
Wyatt, director of the Port of Portland, said even if all goes according
to schedule, it’s unlikely a terminal would be operational
on the island for at least 10 years.